>曼彻斯特编码是不是在时钟系统下传输比特的基本方式是 - 虽然我认为压缩肯定不在交易中。我只是想知道信号是如何进入系统的。因为时钟很重要你跑尝试使用Windows作为函数生成器时遇到同样的问题 - 它不是确定性的。 64ms的。虽然可能是可行的。看起来编码并不是那么挑剔。不过，硬件比软件更受欢迎。-SHAWN- 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文> Isn't manchester encoding a fundamental way of transporting bits under > a clock systemYes - though I gather that compression is definitely not in the deal.I'm just wondering how the signal is getting into the system.Since clocking is important you run into the same problem when trying to use Windows as a function generator - it ain't deterministic. 64ms. is probably doable though. It looks like the encoding isn't all that picky. Still, hardware is much more preferable than software.-SHAWN-
2018-09-07 16:37
RT1050的uclinux有哪些优势？RT1050的uclinux该如何去使用呢？
2021-10-21 07:49
