近日，无线基础设施领域专业权威媒体RCR Wireless News发布第三方市场研究机构Sky Light Research文章《5G backhaul，microwave exceed expectations》。文章分析了5G时代eMBB、mMTC和uRLLC三大新领域带来的挑战，以及为满足这些应用的发展诉求，未来网络在带宽、时延、SDN等方面需要达成的能力。同时文章指出，目前全球有50%~60%的移动基站通过微波进行回传，随着5G部署步伐的加快，网络容量、复杂性、时延要求更高，移动基站的数量也会增加。微波作为无光纤场景下的重要传输手段，随着5G的演进还会继续扩大。文章表示，目前以华为为代表的微波设备商，正在从大带宽、低时延、灵活运维等关键领域出发，来确保其微波将满足5G时代承载网络的要求。
2019-06-18 06:26
小型蜂窝的速度和数量问题，不看肯定后悔
2021-05-24 06:11
IEEE 802.16e有移动性服务能力吗？一种基于IP的移动WiMAX网络应用方案
2021-05-28 06:57
我希望安捷伦支付我找到FieldFox的错误 - 我会成为一个富翁。在菜单中显示该连接器类型的任何校准套件之前，似乎需要至少两个相同连接器类型的校准套件。我可举几个例子，但最容易再现的是85039B 75欧姆F型连接器。 85039B位于固件中，是固件中唯一的F连接器套件。但是如果选择F型连接器，则无法看到85039B。附加文件“copy_of_85039B.xml”实际上与FieldFox中的“85039B.xml”文件相同。唯一的区别是“标签”行，我修改为读取85039B的副本如果文件“copy_of_85039B.xml”现在加载到FieldFox中，则会看到两个校准套件1）85039B 2）85039B的副本，而之前有没有用于F连接器。这个错误不是特定于F连接器，因为我看到7 mm套件和我制作的SMA套件的相同行为。戴夫 以上来自于谷歌翻译 以下为原文I wish Agilent would pay me for finding FieldFox bugs - I would be a rich man. It would appear that there needs to be at least two calibration kits of the same connector type before any of the calibration kits of that connector type are shown in the menus. I could give several examples of this, but the most easily reproduced is the 85039B 75 Ohm F-connector. The 85039B is in the firmware, and is the only F-connector kit in the firmware. But if you select the type F connector, the 85039B can't be seen. The attached file "copy_of_85039B.xml" is virtually identical to the "85039B.xml" file in the FieldFox. The only difference is the "Label" line, which I modified to read copy of 85039B If the file "copy_of_85039B.xml" is now loaded into the FieldFox, one sees two calibration kits 1) 85039B 2) copy of 85039B whereas previously there were none for the F-connector. This bug is not specific to the F-connector, as I see the same behavior with 7 mm kits and an SMA kit I made. Dave附件copy_of_85039B.xml4.6 KB
2019-01-08 14:47
