• 发文章

  • 发资料

  • 发帖

  • 提问

  • 发视频

创作活动
0
登录后你可以
  • 下载海量资料
  • 学习在线课程
  • 观看技术视频
  • 写文章/发帖/加入社区
返回

电子发烧友 电子发烧友

  • 全文搜索
    • 全文搜索
    • 标题搜索
  • 全部时间
    • 全部时间
    • 1小时内
    • 1天内
    • 1周内
    • 1个月内
  • 默认排序
    • 默认排序
    • 按时间排序
  • 全部板块
    • 全部板块
大家还在搜
  • 在stm32l496 + TouchGFX期间失去正确的刷新频率怎么办?

    的刷新频率,因为 engin 将创建一帧又一帧,从不暂停,即使你只是调用 touchgfx::OSWrappers::signalVSync() 一次。到目前为止,还没有人给出答案。做得好。

    2023-01-13 09:11

  • NUC972配置管脚输出高频时钟CLK_OUT异常是怎么回事?

    (REG_CLK_PCLKEN0,getReg32(REG_CLK_PCLKEN0) | (1<<3)); //Enable GPIO engin clock.

    2023-06-26 06:40

  • USART驱动程序中的缓冲区队列写入将返回无效的句柄

    去NULL清除读取队列。我对调试C++/STL的GUT GUT没有兴趣,但它似乎很重要。我想知道,在某种程度上,接收和发送缓冲句柄来自于C++/Engin在和谐实现中支持的组合池是否会引起问题。我已经

    2019-09-30 15:45

  • DM6446在linux下server编译时异常,请问怎么处理

    /dvevm_1_00_00_32/codec_engin e_1_00/packages;/home/feng/dvevm_1_00_00_32/xdais_5_00/packages;/home/feng/dvevm

    2018-06-21 10:54

  • Muny驱动程序不允许更新BFM?

    背景:MPLAB X IDE V4.15,XC32 V2.05,ValueV2.05,PIC32 MZ2048 EFH100I应该指出,我已经成功地获得了LIFEUPDENT来处理我的应用程序,完成了自定义条件来强制引导程序,等等。Muny驱动程序不允许您更新BFM?换句话说,它只允许编程的PFM。我得到的印象,和谐的驱动程序没有,但手摇驱动程序可以这样做:HTTP://www. MyCHIP.COM/FUMMS/M92667 5.ASPXF如果回答前一个问题是,那么有任何计划来改变这一点吗?我问的原因是,它似乎是值得的编程BFM和PFM的未使用的面板在同一时间通过可加载。这样,您可以相对容易地更新配置位,而较少担心可能会失去一致性。我真的怀疑我必须改变配置位设置经常,如果在所有,所以也许这不是那么多的价值。更糟糕的是,它似乎使设备变得更容易,就像引导加载程序被破解一样,你是怎么回来的?彻底改变配置位意味着一些严重的变化(至少对我来说),所以最好是通过传统的程序员在那个事件中更新板。我想得越多,如果不能更新BFM,那么和声的设置实际上是有意义的。用户总是可以通过应用程序更新PFM,但是Bootloader将作为回落而存在,并且更难于砖块。在配置位之外,这允许相当多的多功能性。 以上来自于百度翻译 以下为原文 Background: MPLAB X IDE v4.15, XC32 v2.05, Harmony v2.05, PIC32MZ2048EFH100 I should point out that I've successfully gotten the liveupdate to work on my application, complete with custom conditions to force the bootloader, etc. I am using Harmony's stock driver, though.Is it true that the stock Harmony driver does not allow you to update a BFM? In other words, it only allows programming of a PFM. I get the impression that Harmony's driver does not, but hand rolled drivers can and do: http://www.microchip.com/forums/m926675.aspxIf the answer to the previous question is yes, then are there any plans to change this? The reason I ask is that it seems like it might be worthwhile to program both the BFM and the PFM of the unused panel at the same time through loadables. This way you could update the configuration bits relatively easily with less fear that things might lose consistency. I truly doubt that I'll have to change the configuration bit settings that often, if at all, so perhaps this isn't of that much value. Worse, it seems like it makes bricking the device easier as if the bootloader gets crapped up how do you get back? Drastically changing the configuration bits implies some serious changes anyway (at least to me), so it's probably best to just update the board through a traditional programmer in that event.The more that I think about it, Harmony's setup actually makes a lot of sense if it can't update the BFM. The user can always update the PFM through the application, but the bootloader will be there as a fall back and it's more difficult to brick. Outside of the configuration bits, this allows for quite a bit of versatility.

    2018-10-15 16:03

  • 机器人工程师学习计划

    如何定义机器人?机器人工程师学习计划分享

    2021-12-20 06:11